|
Post by socalexile on Aug 16, 2017 7:41:18 GMT -6
As far as the Temple, these guys have already built the instruments and are training the priests, and tried to appoint a High Priest, Rabbi Baruch Kahane, who declined the offer. All they need is to be allowed to build it. Here they are last Passover sacrificing a lamb at the Western Wall:
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 16, 2017 8:25:41 GMT -6
Have you studied the Masons much socalexile?
|
|
|
Post by socalexile on Aug 16, 2017 8:35:03 GMT -6
Have you studied the Masons much socalexile? The Pike conspiracy was based on a letter that Carr alleged he wrote, but never produced. Without evidence, there is no reason to believe the conspiracy.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 16, 2017 9:18:40 GMT -6
I beg to differ. But I guess you apparently have the final word on the subject.
|
|
|
Post by socalexile on Aug 16, 2017 9:33:05 GMT -6
I beg to differ. But I guess you apparently have the final word on the subject. Why does stating facts result in such a snarky response? If there is verifiable proof, and not just claims, then post it. We know there is a vast satanic conspiracy, because Satan himself is leading it-although I think we give him more credit than he deserves. For Carr's accusations to be believed as fact, there must be evidence. Otherwise it is sin.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 16, 2017 9:35:50 GMT -6
I will PM you on the subject.
|
|
|
Post by watchmanjim on Aug 16, 2017 11:15:40 GMT -6
I beg to differ. But I guess you apparently have the final word on the subject. Why does stating facts result in such a snarky response? If there is verifiable proof, and not just claims, then post it. We know there is a vast satanic conspiracy, because Satan himself is leading it-although I think we give him more credit than he deserves. For Carr's accusations to be believed as fact, there must be evidence. Otherwise it is sin. Wow. I'm still trying to figure out what just happened here. To all reading this, especially non-member observers, I apologize for how this wound up. Truthseeker has removed her membership from the board with little explanation to us, so I don't know exactly why she did so.
|
|
|
Post by yardstick on Aug 16, 2017 12:11:39 GMT -6
Why does stating facts result in such a snarky response? If there is verifiable proof, and not just claims, then post it. We know there is a vast satanic conspiracy, because Satan himself is leading it-although I think we give him more credit than he deserves. For Carr's accusations to be believed as fact, there must be evidence. Otherwise it is sin. Wow. I'm still trying to figure out what just happened here. To all reading this, especially non-member observers, I apologize for how this wound up. Truthseeker has removed her membership from the board with little explanation to us, so I don't know exactly why she did so. I too am both non-plussed and puzzled.
|
|
|
Post by watchmanjim on Aug 16, 2017 12:48:32 GMT -6
Let's pray for her. I really appreciate her many contributions. I hope she's all right.
|
|
|
Post by socalexile on Aug 16, 2017 19:12:57 GMT -6
Let's pray for her. I really appreciate her many contributions. I hope she's all right. I'll forward you the PM.
|
|
|
Post by whatif on Aug 16, 2017 21:43:33 GMT -6
I am so sorry, socalexile... I am greatly saddened by this. We love you, and we love truthseeker. I am hoping that both of you know this.
|
|
|
Post by socalexile on Aug 17, 2017 1:24:32 GMT -6
I am so sorry, socalexile... I am greatly saddened by this. We love you, and we love truthseeker. I am hoping that both of you know this. Thanks. I meant her no ill will; I was just trying to get her to see that what Carr had done amounted to false witness in regards to Pike. Those who perpetuate it are in a way, complicit, as the rest of us tend to do. I was surprised at her sudden reaction. I'm sorry it went that way. The other part of the Albert Pike conspiracy is that people use it to say that the modern state of Israel is part of a satanic conspiracy, and then it all goes downhill from there. We really shouldn't get drawn into conspiracies and accusations without evidence. That's all I was trying to emphasize. Sorry for the drama.
|
|
|
Post by whatif on Aug 17, 2017 1:33:42 GMT -6
Thank you, socalexile--we do appreciate that
|
|
|
Post by disciple4life on Sept 6, 2017 12:54:20 GMT -6
There are some clues about Jesus coming back after 2 days (2000) in the Bible. In the parable of Good Samaritan, the Samaritan (Jesus) gave to innkeeper (Holy Spirit) 2 denarii. 1 denary was a day’s wage in the time of Jesus. The 2 denarii speak of 2 days. Also in the story of Lazarus’ resurrection it says that “He stayed two more days in the place where He was.” Then after this Jesus said: “Let us go to Judea again.” That’s why I am not up to this hype about upcoming Sign. Many Christians are putting their doctrines and faith on the line if the Rapture won’t happen in September and it’s kind of strange to hear. As I said I wasn’t that up to the end-time prophecy until recently, so people probably were excited about blood moons 3 years ago. When I read Christian articles about the Sign in September and the Rapture that could happen it seems that many want to believe in something and they just looking for “proofs” that support their belief in different places. The 88 reasons of Jesus coming in 1988 is a good example of it. In terms of the interpretation of the Scripture I believe we need to come to the Lord empty handed without any personal beliefs and receive from Him with an open heart. The prophecy is kind of tricky to understand. That’s why we should rely on the Lord and not on our own understanding. One thing for sure is that when the Day is approaching many Bible prophecies become more clear. Its like the Scripture says: “The path of the righteous is like the light of dawn, that shines brighter and brighter until the full day.” Hello Paul. Very good thoughts, my brother. I agree with you about the Sept alignment. My take is that there are way too many holes/ speculations and it's based on a man-made, secular program, which in turn is based off of Gentile years. Aside from this, I've read multiple people say that the same sign happened at the birth of Christ. Even if these things could all be disproven, there are still other unanswered questions that are all built on - depend on mens' speculation. 1. That Revelation 12 actually happens before the tribulation starts. and 2. Why the sign only deals with the first two verses, but somehow the next two verses don't apply. I think it means something, but not the rapture. The other bigger issue that I see is that Feast of Trumpets starts at Sundown on Wed, Sep 20 and goes through sundown on Friday 22. Christ either fulfills the Feasts perfectly or he doesn't. It's a whole slippery slope to start saying this happened [like Christ's birth at Sukkot], but there's a lot of loose ends, details that are missing, so this one is close, but not precise. Christ fulfilled the first four feasts in perfect order and in perfect precision, right on the day. Not several days before or after. What I see is the rapture on Feast of Trumpets - and then mayby some delay ?? So the Sept alignment could be the trigger - the start of the tribulation. [Many prophecy teachers agree that no other feast comes close to being rapture.] Feast of Booths, no trumpets, last feast - it's out of order - not mentioned in rapture passages. The last Trumpet that Paul mentions in 1 Cor 15:52 only refers to Feast of Trumpets - not Day of Atonement, and not Sukkot. I'm really open to other views and perspectives - but I think the feasts are inseparable with the messiah and the next one in order is FOT. I definitely believe in the convergence of signs, and that this is the last generation. Fig Tree 1947. Maranatha.
|
|