On the subject of 2017, here is an article that connects the Christ angle--a subject brought up in the thread regarding UFO Disclosure, if I recall correctly--to Rosh Hashanah 2017. I found it quite fascinating, but I have to admit I am not a mathematician, so a good deal of it was a little confusing to my brain. Is anyone here at the forum good with geometry and able to verify the accuracy of the information in the article?
Source: "The Oracle in Stone," Signs of the End: A Discovery of Biblical Timelines, 26 May 2011.
watchfortheday.org/signsoftheend/giza2024.html
Your link is Daniel Matson's web page. I asked him last october why he left out the 26" slope angle leading to Stonehenge. He replied he had deliberately left it out, because he could see no prophetic value in Stonehenge. I reminded him how he had referenced Bonnie Gaunt, in his own book, and attempted to prompt him into making a statement one way or the other, but he made no reply. As I directed you yesterday, Bonnie Gaunt holds the answers to nearly everything related to Stonehenge and the Great Pyramid.
I made numerous posts on his facebook thread, supporting his work there. For some unknown reason, he blocked me from posting, and also made invisible everything I had written going back to Aug. 2014. I love the fellow,,, he made no reply?? I highly recommend you read everything in his web page, and everything in the links he provides. There are a lot of highly enlightening things there.
Pinned at the top of his FB thread, is a reference to the above link. Prior to last month, another similar thread was pinned at the top. It included within "comments" a jaw dropping commentary about validity of the sign of the woman; the theme of the pinned post. If you go to my FB page
www.facebook.com/chang.mao.334 you can read my posts that I saved to my personal page nearly each time I commented on his FB page.
Regarding the 26* slope angle, it has been named the Christ Angle for up to 200 years. C. Piazzi Smyth, Astronomer Royal of Scotland,
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Piazzi_Smyth was among the earliest scientists to UNSEAL the truths encapsulated within it. He may have been the discoverer of the angle crossing Bethlehem. I do not recall if he also discovered the same angle crossing the marker stones of Stonehenge. I used to keep his books on my shelf, but there are so many Pastors in the Philippines who begged me to get some good books to them, I hardly keep anything anymore.
In the earlier days of WeScott Christian Center, Dr. Scott would give these books away. Bonnie Gaunt "stonehenge, a closer look" was among the gifted books. Dr. Scott made Bonnie famous. She became a prolific writer afterwards.
Regarding the validity of Daniel's timeline:
The model for his work is that of Clarence Larkin.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clarence_LarkinIn general, he follows in the path Larkin created. Using more modern methods, and better resources, he developed what you see in his works.
He is damn good at sorting out the mathematical relations between the events of the recent past, and those in the heavens related to historical
events, and even those in the future. I believe he learned how to do it from Bonnie Gaunt, but he has not indicated her as a mentor in that field of work. You should by all means spend the next few weeks, or more if necessary, digesting the work he has given us on his web site. Also, you should purchase both of his books, found on his web site.
While I am endorsing reading everything he writes; I must add, that I attempted to enlighten him on key issues he was apparently unaware of, just as I will continually attempt to do here. Because he never replied, (unless he thought I was posting something he disagreed with [happened twice]) I really do not know if he believed anything I was writing was of value to him. I once reminded him how the standard evangelical views him as an aberration, indicating he would be better off if he left their doctrines on the shelf.
The biggest area of simplistic error he carries, it that common error related to Israel. He simply refuses to include in his theology/escatology the reality of prophetic Israel, as distinct from prophetic Judah; as in: The Two Houses Of Israel, The Two Kingdoms, Chosen by God to be his servants. These are, the House of Judah, and the House of Israel. Combined, the are: The Whole House of Israel. They are also, the prophetic prostitute wives of God, Ahola (Israel) and Aholabah (Judah). Because he omits these REALLY BIG THEMES, he will no doubt be surprised with what happens through the apocalypse, as well nearly all who are watching carefully, they will also be surprised.
Other than that, you will serve yourself well, if you read all of his stuff.
Charie and Ed
