|
|
Post by bernie on Sept 10, 2021 16:24:34 GMT -6
|
|
|
|
Post by sog on Nov 30, 2021 10:35:50 GMT -6
I pulled out some key parts of this article, but read the whole thing at the link. Wonder if there will be any repercussions shortly after. Headline: REENACTMENT OF ANOINTING THE HIGH PRIEST TO BE HELD ON LAST NIGHT OF HANUKKAH www.israel365news.com/263584/reenactment-of-anointing-the-high-priest-to-be-held-on-last-night-of-hanukkah/From link - On Monday, December 6, a reenactment of several Temple ceremonies will be held in Mitzpe Yericho. The reenactments will include a demonstration of the anointing of the High Priest, and the lighting of the Temple menorah. A new altar will be dedicated for use on the Temple Mount. Each ceremony is an essential element of the Temple service and practical efforts such as these are intended to prepare for the Third Temple. ... Burning the oil in the Temple was considered a sacrifice in every respect, and does not require an actual Temple building to house it. The Biblical commandment could be fulfilled today by placing the Menorah on the Temple Mount, filling it with the oil that has been prepared, and having it lit by a Kohen (a Jewish man from the priestly caste). ... The event will also feature the dedication of a new altar. The altar adheres to the minimum requirements which will allow it to be used on the Temple Mount. It is hollow and relatively small, designed to be filled with specially selected stones that have already been prepared. This altar is designed to be ready at a moment’s notice and able to be transported and assembled on the Temple Mount. |
|
|
|
Post by mike on Dec 6, 2021 11:11:59 GMT -6
any other info on this - video is under one minute
|
|
|
|
Post by disciple4life on Dec 6, 2021 12:08:39 GMT -6
any other info on this - video is under one minute Hey mike, others. I also saw this short clip and noticed that others commented that the title of the video is a stretch. Here is the actual quote and a link so you can see for yourself. It's right about the 21:30 minute mark. **Context , Context, Context - He's talking about the Jewish father and his sons, the Maccabees, who led the uprising, and the event which became the actual holiday itself - when there was only enough oil for 1 day, but the oil miraculously lasted for 8 days, and Hannukah actually means Dedication. [ This was in the 400 years between the testaments, and this is why 3 of the books of the Apocrypha are 1st, Second and 3rd Maccabees. There is great historical detail about the revolt and the events that lead up to the Holiday itself, - Much like Purim, which was from the story of Ester. The events are confirmed by Josephus, but the books are not inspired by God, and thus not part of the Canon.] We see Jesus actually celebrating Hannukah in the Gospels -- one passage in John, and it says Feast of Dedication - this is Hannuikah, and the word is actually Hannukah, but people gloss over it, because it says Dedication in their English Bibles. Biden, "That little bit of light — that little bit of light, wherever it is found, can dispel the darkness and illuminate a path forward. And whether it’s in the Temple in Jerusalem or a temple of our democracy, nothing broken or profaned is beyond repair. Nothing. We can always build back better or perhaps build back brighter." IMHO it's a vague reference to the 2nd temple being "profaned" by Antiochus Epiphanes, when he sacrificed a pig on the altar. No mention whatsoever of the 3rd temple. Here is the link for the entire speech - transcribed by the official Whitehouse website. www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/speeches-remarks/2021/12/01/remarks-by-president-biden-during-a-menorah-lighting-in-celebration-of-hanukkah/and here is the link for the entire speech - Go to the 21:00 mark. As an aside note, I can't help but mention how appalling and totally disgusting it is, that he should stand up and babble about how we should stand up against anti-semitism, when last week, while the world was distracted by the new Omicron variant, Biden quietly cancelled the sanctions on Iran, - literally releasing tens of millions of cash to pay Iran to enrich uranium, so that they can wipe Israel off the map, which they have repeatedly said to the whole world.   |
|
|
|
Post by sog on Dec 6, 2021 13:11:28 GMT -6
|
|
|
|
Post by disciple4life on Dec 10, 2021 8:33:34 GMT -6
bernie, sog, mike, disciple4life, stormyknight, tennessean, Natalie Hello brothers and sisters, I thought you would find this interesting as well, On the last day of Hannukah, three separate temple ceremonies were carried out, in preparation for the 3rd temple. 1. a New, mobile altar was dedicated. It's portable and can be brought in on a flatbed trailer, 2. The solid gold temple menorah, - which is housed in the Temple institute, was lit. 3. The annointing of a high priest, - using the special anointing oil, that they have prepared, and which they plan to use to anoint the Messiah. Sure seems like things are all falling into place.
|
|
|
|
Post by sog on Jan 15, 2022 15:58:04 GMT -6
Not the Dome of the Rock, but another mosque. There surely will be ramifications for destroying it. Will Islam go to war over it? Could this be the trigger of a Mideast war and The Covenant after? If they destroy this mosque and a war ensues, will Israel, after victory by God's protection, also destroy the Dome of the Rock to make room for a Temple? Headline: COURT ISSUES DEMOLITION ORDER ON JERUSALEM’S “OTHER GOLD-DOMED MOSQUE” www.israel365news.com/265269/court-issues-demolition-order-on-jerusalems-other-gold-domed-mosque/From link - The Jerusalem Municipality has issued a demolition order for the “Golden Dome” building in the Beit Safafa neighborhood of Jerusalem. “This is a huge construction, on a very large scale, built without a permit, without planning, while placing a finished fact on the ground, while violently and blatantly disregarding the rule of law,” the demolition order said. Construction of the building was completed several months ago. The demolition order reads: “There is public in issuing the demolition order against the prohibited works due to the fact that the designation of the land is an area designated for a public building. This is a prohibited construction in an area of about 760 meters.” “This is a huge construction, on a very large scale, built without a permit, without planning, while establishing facts on the ground, with violent and blatant disregard for the rule of law,” read the order that was published in the “Mynet Jerusalem”. The Al-Rahman Mosque in Beit Safafa, one of four mosques in the neighborhood, was built in 1948 but was recently refurbished and dramatically enlarged. Unlike the Dome of the Rock on the Temple Mount, the dome of the Al Rahman Mosque is painted with a reflective gold colored paint. |
|
|
|
Post by sog on Feb 13, 2022 20:24:46 GMT -6
Very good article about Jewish Temple treasures being held in the Vatican. More than a few eyewitnesses over the years. Could their return be part of a new covenant with Israel? Headline: Is there new evidence of Jewish Temple treasures in the Vatican? www.jpost.com/jerusalem-report/article-696068 |
|
|
|
Post by Gary on Feb 14, 2022 9:17:01 GMT -6
Very good article about Jewish Temple treasures being held in the Vatican. More than a few eyewitnesses over the years. Could their return be part of a new covenant with Israel? Headline: Is there new evidence of Jewish Temple treasures in the Vatican? www.jpost.com/jerusalem-report/article-696068My pastor shared this with me this morning. Mind-blowing. Actually seems like the most plausible scenario. |
|
|
|
Post by sog on Dec 22, 2022 11:58:14 GMT -6
Seems like they were half joking, but raised some more serious implications. Headlin: Knesset Committee discusses whether a new minister will be appointed for the Third Temple www.israel365news.com/363858/knesset-committee-discusses-whether-a-new-minister-will-be-appointed-for-the-third-temple/From article: During a discussion in a Knesset committee concerning a new law, a question was raised about its application after the construction of the Third Temple. Though the suggestion was in jest and generated light-hearted banter, most of the opposition to the law came from the religious MKs while many of the non-religious lawmakers said they supported the law and did not oppose the Temple. Hebrew language Kikar HaShabbat reported that on Wednesday morning, the Knesset’s Constitution, Law and Justice Committee discussed Amendment No. 14 to one the country’s Basic Law titled “The Government,” which adopted in its current form in 2001 to outline the composition and function of the Israeli government. The amendment currently being considered allows for the addition of ministers. The question was raised by MK Michal Shir (Yesh Atid), a non-religious MK, if the government would be able, or even required to appoint an additional minister if the Third Temple is constructed. It should be noted that Shir opposed the bill and clearly intended the question to be a critical note of sarcasm to illustrate the shortcomings of the intended law. The suggestion caused a bit of consternation as questions were raised if voting in favor of the amendment implied support for the construction of the Jewish Temple in Jerusalem. Several MKs noted that they favored the law but not the Temple. Others noted that they opposed the law but not the Temple. This caused a moment of confusion when a vote was called with one MK asking if they were voting for the Temple or the amendment. Several of the religious MKs voted “Nay”, presumably opposing the amendment but not necessarily opposing the Third Temple. “You see, the Reform Jews will make the Temple for us,” one religious MK noted. “I have no problem that there will be a Temple,” MK Shir said. “It may as well come tomorrow, as far as I am concerned.” Shlomo Karhi (Likud) raised the question, “Who will design the Third Temple? Ayelet Shaked?”. Shaked from the Yamina party is currently serving as Minister of Interior. She does not identify as religiously observant. MK Shir responded, “Even a woman can design the temple.” MK Uriel Buso noted that “there really is religion in the opposition”. |
|
